# LoopGuard-AI Canonical POC V1.0.11 — Independent Final Integrity Verification

**Specification target:** Canonical POC Specification V1.5.1 Rev B  
**Locked specification SHA-256:** `ddcdaa3adc72e4d71e16d93bfb9dc6b7e72a6ec8ceea60f27821588883426129`  
**Engine:** `1.0.11-poc`  
**Decision-semantics version:** `1.0.11`  
**Code SHA-256:** `1fa2cf1f0aca8d6bb65a1a2def0c9ecfbcebc193c2289bedf74c9c7436f3913b`  
**Verdict:** **PASS — CANONICAL PUBLICATION LOCK PERMITTED**

## Fresh baseline reverification

- Canonical Scenario Library: **43/43 PASS**
- Adversarial Invariants: **30/30 PASS**
- Prior High-Final-Audit regressions: **18/18 PASS**
- Configuration/Evidence regressions: **13/13 PASS**
- V1.0.3 regressions: **5/5 PASS**
- V1.0.4 regressions: **7/7 PASS**
- V1.0.5 regressions: **11/11 PASS**
- V1.0.6 regressions: **13/13 PASS**
- V1.0.7 regressions: **20/20 PASS**
- V1.0.8 regressions: **24/24 PASS**
- V1.0.9 regressions: **17/17 PASS**
- V1.0.10 regressions: **12/12 PASS**
- V1.0.11 regressions: **12/12 PASS**
- Fresh full rerun #2: **ALL 225 shipped checks PASS**
- Python bytecode compilation: **PASS**
- Duplicate top-level definitions: **NONE**

## Independent final probes

Independent integrity probes: **15/15 PASS**.

- **IFV111-01 — Fresh-engine verification of clean persisted Run: PASS**
- **IFV111-02 — Pending authorization remains valid across fresh engine instance: PASS**
- **IFV111-03 — Persisted authorization can be consumed after engine restart: PASS**
- **IFV111-04 — Cross-run authorization transplant is not consumable: PASS**
- **IFV111-05 — Invalid override gate produces no lifecycle mutation: PASS**
- **IFV111-06 — Blank override justification produces no lifecycle mutation: PASS**
- **IFV111-07 — Invalid authorization status produces no event artifact: PASS**
- **IFV111-08 — Future authorization timestamp is rejected before persistence: PASS**
- **IFV111-09 — Authorization at exact completion boundary is valid: PASS**
- **IFV111-10 — Verifier rejects authorization issued after accepted override: PASS**
- **IFV111-11 — Versioned custom evidence minima are honored and hash-bound: PASS**
- **IFV111-12 — Subminimum quality under custom minima remains non-SHIP: PASS**
- **IFV111-13 — EQ-03 conditionality is preserved when evidence_minimums.required=false: PASS**
- **IFV111-14 — Manifest event attribution cannot be permuted: PASS**
- **IFV111-15 — Strict JSON semantics apply to lifecycle authorization artifacts: PASS**

The independent probes were intentionally outside the shipped V1.0.11 regression list. They exercised fresh-engine replay, persisted authorization continuity, cross-Run binding, mutation atomicity, timestamp boundaries, terminal lifecycle parity, custom V1.5.1 evidence minima, optional evidence semantics, manifest-event attribution, and strict JSON handling in lifecycle artifacts.

## Randomized lifecycle reconstruction

- Schema-valid randomized lifecycle cases: **100/100 PASS**
- Gate distribution: `{'ROLLBACK': 38, 'SHIP': 39, 'RESTRICT': 23}`
- Lifecycle distribution: `{'noauth-reject': 18, 'auth-request': 28, 'pending-auth': 17, 'twoauth-request': 16, 'none': 21}`

## Scope-boundary confirmation

One additional probe intentionally tested the documented trust boundary rather than a conformance invariant. A process with direct authority to create canonical Run artifacts and recompute the unkeyed manifest chain can construct an internally self-consistent authorization history. The verifier accepts that history because V1.0.11 is explicitly an interface-level integrity POC, not a cryptographic trust-anchor or tamper-proof authentication system.

This observation is **not treated as a failing finding**, because the V1.0.11 remediation report explicitly excludes cryptographic authenticity from the POC claim boundary. Publication text must preserve that boundary and must not describe the manifest chain as cryptographically trusted, externally authenticated, or tamper-proof.

## Material findings

**None.** No new implementation defect was reproduced within the locked deterministic POC contract.

## Publication disposition

> **INDEPENDENT FINAL INTEGRITY VERIFICATION — PASS / CANONICAL PUBLICATION LOCK PERMITTED**

V1.0.11 may proceed to the publication-lock stage without reopening Canonical POC Specification V1.5.1 Rev B.

## Scope boundary

These results establish deterministic synthetic POC integrity only. They do **not** establish empirical metric validity, empirical CEP validity, production validation or readiness, certification, regulator acceptance, customer validation, or real-world safety efficacy.

## Next step

Create the **Canonical Publication Lock** for V1.0.11, freeze the publication artifact set and hashes, then prepare the WIX publication package and INLINE HTML.